New Mexico: Holding Teachers Accountable for Missing More Than 3 Days of Work

Please follow and like us:

One state that seems to still be going strong after the passage of last January’s Every Student Succeeds Act (ESSA) — via which the federal government removed (or significantly relaxed) its former mandates that all states adopt and use of growth and value-added models (VAMs) to hold their teachers accountable (see here) — is New Mexico.

This should be of no surprise to followers of this blog, especially those who have not only recognized the decline in posts via this blog post ESSA (see a post about this decline here), but also those who have noted that “New Mexico” is the state most often mentioned in said posts post ESSA (see for example here, here, and here).

Well, apparently now (and post  revisions likely caused by the ongoing lawsuit regarding New Mexico’s teacher evaluation system, of which attendance is/was a part; see for example here, here, and here), teachers are to now also be penalized if missing more than three days of work.

As per a recent article in the Santa Fe New Mexican (here), and the title of this article, these new teacher attendance regulations, as to be factored into teachers’ performance evaluations, has clearly caught schools “off guard.”

“The state has said that including attendance in performance reviews helps reduce teacher absences, which saves money for districts and increases students’ learning time.” In fact, effective this calendar year, 5 percent of a teacher’s evaluation is to be made up of teacher attendance. New Mexico Public Education Department spokesman Robert McEntyre clarified that “teachers can miss up to three days of work without being penalized.” He added that “Since attendance was first included in teacher evaluations, it’s estimated that New Mexico schools are collectively saving $3.5 million in costs for substitute teachers and adding 300,000 hours of instructional time back into [their] classrooms.”

“The new guidelines also do not dock teachers for absences covered by the federal Family and Medical Leave Act, or absences because of military duty, jury duty, bereavement, religious leave or professional development programs.” Reported to me only anecdotally (i.e., I could not find evidence of this elsewhere), the new guidelines might also dock teachers for engaging in professional development or overseeing extracurricular events such as debate team performances. If anybody has anything to add on this end, especially as evidence of this, please do comment below.

2 thoughts on “New Mexico: Holding Teachers Accountable for Missing More Than 3 Days of Work

  1. Thanks to a follower: “A teacher’s attendance score is based on the number of days the teacher was absent during the academic year. However, absences due to the Family Medical Leave Act (FMLA), bereavement, jury duty, military leave, religious leave, professional development, or coaching are excused and should not be reported as absences by the district to PED.”

  2. I stared at this site’s logo for 5 minutes thinking, “are the letters moving or no”. Great optical illusion lol. I agree, they shouldn’t (nor should any type of worker) be docked for those types of absences, that’s ridiculous. Like we as educators don’t have a hard enough time….

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *